|
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
|
|
|
|
+# Decision for: Create a toolchain team
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+<!--
|
|
|
|
|
+Part of the Carbon Language project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
|
|
|
|
|
+Exceptions. See /LICENSE for license information.
|
|
|
|
|
+SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
|
|
|
+-->
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+Proposal accepted on 2020-12-08
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+Affirming:
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+- [austern](https://github.com/austern)
|
|
|
|
|
+- [chandlerc](https://github.com/chandlerc)
|
|
|
|
|
+- [geoffromer](https://github.com/geoffromer)
|
|
|
|
|
+- [gribozavr](https://github.com/gribozavr)
|
|
|
|
|
+- [josh11b](https://github.com/josh11b)
|
|
|
|
|
+- [noncombatant](https://github.com/noncombatant)
|
|
|
|
|
+- [zygoloid](https://github.com/zygoloid)
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+Abstaining:
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+- [tituswinters](https://github.com/tituswinters)
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+## Open questions
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+### Should the name of the team be "toolchain team" or "implementation team"?
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+Some core team members expressed a preference for "implementation team", none
|
|
|
|
|
+expressed a preference for "toolchain team", all were fine either way. As
|
|
|
|
|
+gribozavr noted, and everyone at the review meeting agreed, the team should be
|
|
|
|
|
+free to choose its own name.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+## Rationale
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
+Carbon's goals include providing a reference implementation and tooling.
|
|
|
|
|
+Delivering this complex software requires a dedicated team, vision, leadership,
|
|
|
|
|
+and a degree of autonomy.
|