This is a skeletal design, added to support the overview. It should not be treated as accepted by the core team; rather, it is a placeholder until we have more time to examine this detail. Please feel welcome to rewrite and update as appropriate.
These types are fundamental to the language as they aren't either formed from or modifying other types. They also have semantics that are defined from first principles rather than in terms of other operations. These will be made available through the prelude package.
bool - a boolean type with two possible values: true and false.i8,
i16, i32, i64, and i128, and u8, u16, u32, u64, and
u128.f16, f32, and f64.BFloat16 is also provided.String - a byte sequence treated as containing UTF-8 encoded text.
StringView - a read-only reference to a byte sequence treated as
containing UTF-8 encoded text.The names bool, true, and false are keywords, and identifiers of the form
i[0-9]*, u[0-9]*, and f[0-9*] are type literals, resulting in the
corresponding type.
Integer types can be either signed or unsigned, much like in C++. Signed
integers are represented using 2's complement and notionally modeled as
unbounded natural numbers. Signed overflow in either direction is an error.
Specific sizes are available, for example: i8, u16, i32, and u128.
There is an upper bound on the size of an integer, most likely initially set to 128 bits due to LLVM limitations.
Floating point types are based on the binary floating point formats provided by
IEEE-754. f16, f32, f64 and, if available, f128 correspond exactly to
those sized IEEE-754 formats, and have the semantics defined by IEEE-754.
Carbon also supports the
BFloat16
format, a 16-bit truncation of a "binary32" IEEE-754 format floating point
number.
There are open questions about the extent to which these types should be defined in Carbon code rather than special. Clearly they can't be directly implemented w/o help, but it might still be useful to force the programmer-observed interface to reside in code. However, this can cause difficulty with avoiding the need to import things gratuitously.
The right model of a string view versus an owning string is still very much unsettled.
Open question around allowing special syntax for wrapping operations (even on signed types) and/or requiring such syntax for wrapping operations on unsigned types.
Supporting non-power-of-two sizes is likely needed to have a clean model for bitfields, but requires more details to be worked out around memory access.